MICP-Reinforced Soil Under Three-Dimensional Grout Injection ConditionView Crossref metadata(active tab) <div id="edit-xml" class="form-item form-type-item"> <?xml version="1.0"?> <doi_batch version="4.4.1" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.1" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.1 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.4.1.xsd"><head><doi_batch_id>000692</doi_batch_id><timestamp>1713883102</timestamp><depositor><depositor_name>University of the Aegean</depositor_name><email_address>uoa@university.com</email_address></depositor><registrant>Global NEST Journal</registrant></head><body><journal><journal_metadata><full_title>Global NEST Journal</full_title><full_title>Global NEST: the international Journal</full_title><issn media_type="print">1790-7632</issn><issn media_type="electronic">2241-777X</issn></journal_metadata><journal_issue><titles><title>Issue 4</title></titles><publication_date><month>12</month><year>2024</year></publication_date><journal_volume><volume>22</volume></journal_volume><issue>4</issue></journal_issue><journal_article><titles><title>MICP-Reinforced Soil Under Three-Dimensional Grout Injection Condition</title></titles><abstract xmlns="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1"><p><p>The use of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) in soil reinforcement has attracted attention in the academic field in recent years. However, most of the existing studies have been conducted based on one-dimensional ( ) grout injection condition. The present study conducted in vitro and sand column experiments of MICP using a ureolytic bacterium (ATCC 11859) (three-dimensional ( ) and models were considered in the sand column experiments) as well as the feasibility and reinforcing effect of the MICP grout injection method. A comparison of the and grout injection methods showed that the specimens reinforced using the grout injection method had higher strength, better homogeneity, a greater content, and a larger permeability coefficient compared with the specimens reinforced using the grout injection method. The limitations of the model should be considered in future practical applications.</p> </p></abstract><publication_date><month>10</month><day>21</day><year>2020</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>484</first_page><last_page>491</last_page></pages><publisher_item><identifier id_type="pii">gnest_03374</identifier></publisher_item><doi_data><doi>10.30955/gnj.003374</doi><timestamp>1713883102</timestamp><resource>https://journal.gnest.org/publication/gnest_03374</resource></doi_data></journal_article></journal></body></doi_batch> </div>
