You are hereHome | Phosphorus and organic matter removal from synthetic wastewater using alum and aluminum hydroxide
Phosphorus and organic matter removal from synthetic wastewater using alum and aluminum hydroxideView Crossref metadata(active tab) <div id="edit-xml" class="form-item form-type-item"> <?xml version="1.0"?> <doi_batch version="4.4.1" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.1" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.1 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.4.1.xsd"><head><doi_batch_id>000696</doi_batch_id><timestamp>1714173481</timestamp><depositor><depositor_name>University of the Aegean</depositor_name><email_address>uoa@university.com</email_address></depositor><registrant>Global NEST Journal</registrant></head><body><journal><journal_metadata><full_title>Global NEST Journal</full_title><full_title>Global NEST: the international Journal</full_title><issn media_type="print">1790-7632</issn><issn media_type="electronic">2241-777X</issn></journal_metadata><journal_issue><titles><title>Issue 2</title></titles><publication_date><month>07</month><year>2024</year></publication_date><journal_volume><volume>8</volume></journal_volume><issue>2</issue></journal_issue><journal_article><titles><title>Phosphorus and organic matter removal from synthetic wastewater using alum and aluminum hydroxide</title></titles><abstract xmlns="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1"><p>At present, chemical processes are widely used to remove phosphorus and organic matter from water or wastewater either as the only advanced treatment method or as a pre-treatment stage to biological treatment, and aluminium salts have been traditionally used as coagulants. In the present study removal of orthophosphate or dissolved organic matter with the use of two aluminium sources: alum [Al2(SO4)3•18H2O] and aluminium hydroxide [Al(OH)3(s)] is examined for the wastewater treatment process. Amorphous aluminium hydroxide was chosen because it is the hydrolyzed (olated) product of alum and an important adsorbent of inorganic and organic substances in soils since bayerite, gibbsite and boehmite contain a large portion of aluminium hydroxides. Laboratory jar test studies were carried out using either an orthophosphate solution (10 mg l-1) or a tannic acid solution (50 mgC l-1) as simulated wastewater and the effect of parameters such as coagulant dose (up to 15 mg Al l-1 in the case of alum and up to 90 mg Al l-1 in the case of Al(OH)3) and pH (2-12) is investigated. The values of these parameters were based upon measurements on municipal wastewaters from the input of the primary treatment of a wastewater plant in Athens. Orthophosphates have been chosen as a P surrogate as they are the major portion of the total P found in wastewater and tannic acid solution was used as a surrogate for soluble organic matter. It was proven that alum is much more efficient in phosphorus and tannic acid removal than aluminium hydroxide. The optimal pH values are 5-6 in both cases, alum and aluminium hydroxide, although alum is efficient in a wider pH range (4-7) and a mechanism was proposed to interpret these results. In pH values less than 6 the mechanism proposed was chemical bonding between Al species and tannic acid or phosphates creating insoluble complexes while in bigger pH values (6-8) adsorption on solid Al(OH)3. Freundlich isotherm was proven to fit satisfactorily the experimental data for aluminium hydroxide and orthophosphate at 250C suggesting heterogeneous sorption, with KF and N values 49,1 and 0,19 respectively. The findings of this work may not only contribute to a better understanding of the chemistry of chemical wastewater treatment and therefore to an improvement of the process but also on phosphorus and organics fixation in soils that contain a large portion of aluminium hydroxides. </p></abstract><publication_date><month>04</month><day>29</day><year>2013</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>121</first_page><last_page>130</last_page></pages><publisher_item><identifier id_type="pii">348</identifier></publisher_item><doi_data><doi>10.30955/gnj.000348</doi><timestamp>1714173481</timestamp><resource>https://journal.gnest.org/publication/348</resource></doi_data></journal_article></journal></body></doi_batch> </div>
